Fijian vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,843,175 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.668. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 33.2 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 18.1%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $50,292, a difference of 10.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $45,764, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($74,205 compared to $75,240, a difference of 1.4%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $55,677, a difference of 2.0%), and median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $36,034, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 22.2%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 21.4%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.43%), female poverty (14.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.62%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 37.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 34.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 21.4%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 0.63%), married-couple households (46.1% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 9.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.65%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 47.0%), no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 41.3%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 53.3%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 16.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.7%).