Immigrants from Africa vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,519,192 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Immigrant from Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.247. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Africa corresponds to an increase of 2.1 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Osage communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 16.8%), median female earnings ($40,257 compared to $36,034, a difference of 11.7%), and median household income ($83,289 compared to $75,240, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($53,457 compared to $50,292, a difference of 6.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,372 compared to $84,461, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,837 compared to $55,677, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 29.6%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 20.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.14%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 22.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.5%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 10.8%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (62.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 44.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 39.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 29.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 37.0%), master's degree (15.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 25.0%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.37%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.59%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Osage communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 50.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 49.5%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.4%).