Czechoslovakian vs Osage Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Osage
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Osage
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Osage Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,178,426 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.552. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.374% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 373.9 Osage.
Czechoslovakian vs Osage Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $88,390, a difference of 14.7%), median household income ($84,965 compared to $75,240, a difference of 12.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $84,461, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $36,034, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $55,677, a difference of 8.8%).
Income Metric | Czechoslovakian | Osage |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,806 | Tragic $39,568 |
Median Family Income | Average $103,273 | Tragic $91,926 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,965 | Tragic $75,240 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,658 | Tragic $42,651 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,382 | Tragic $50,292 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,738 | Tragic $36,034 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,224 | Tragic $45,764 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,070 | Tragic $84,461 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $101,387 | Tragic $88,390 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,581 | Tragic $55,677 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 27.1% |
Czechoslovakian vs Osage Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.2%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 23.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.4%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 11.5%).
Poverty Metric | Czechoslovakian | Osage |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 13.6% |
Families | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 9.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 14.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 20.0% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 16.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.8% | Tragic 19.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 17.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 17.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 16.5% |
Single Females | Fair 21.3% | Tragic 24.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Tragic 32.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Excellent 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Average 11.7% |
Czechoslovakian vs Osage Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Czechoslovakian | Osage |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Average 5.3% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Average 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.4% | Fair 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Good 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Czechoslovakian vs Osage Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czechoslovakian | Osage |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.3% | Tragic 63.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Tragic 78.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.9% | Exceptional 39.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.5% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 82.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 82.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 80.6% |
Czechoslovakian vs Osage Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 9.6%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 0.090%), family households (64.6% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Czechoslovakian | Osage |
Family Households | Excellent 64.6% | Tragic 63.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.5% | Good 46.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Average 6.4% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Excellent 47.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.3% | Tragic 13.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.0% | Fair 32.1% |
Czechoslovakian vs Osage Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 4.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Osage |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Exceptional 58.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 22.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Czechoslovakian vs Osage Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 15.5%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
Education Level Metric | Czechoslovakian | Osage |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.1% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Good 92.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.4% | Tragic 84.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.8% | Tragic 62.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Tragic 55.8% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.0% | Tragic 41.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Tragic 33.0% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.5% | Tragic 12.6% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.7% |
Czechoslovakian vs Osage Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 22.9%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.0%).
Disability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Osage |
Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 14.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 14.0% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 14.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.8% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 8.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 14.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.0% | Tragic 27.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.6% | Tragic 49.8% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 2.7% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 7.4% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |