Latvian vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,034,344 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.216. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.068% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 67.9 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $39,568, a difference of 33.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $88,390, a difference of 31.2%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $91,926, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $45,764, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $55,677, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 39.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 38.8%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 11.6%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 40.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 26.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 23.4%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.6%), currently married (48.5% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 17.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 68.8%), master's degree (19.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 57.7%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.19%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 42.5%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 39.3%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 6.7%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.6%).