Guatemalan vs Osage Community Comparison

COMPARE

Guatemalan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Osage
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Guatemalans

Osage

Poor
Fair
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Osage Integration in Guatemalan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,190,136 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.609. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to an increase of 8.7 Osage.
Guatemalan Integration in Osage Communities

Guatemalan vs Osage Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 19.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $45,764, a difference of 12.6%), and median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $50,292, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,705 compared to $88,390, a difference of 0.78%), median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $36,034, a difference of 0.95%), and median household income ($75,961 compared to $75,240, a difference of 0.96%).
Guatemalan vs Osage Income
Income MetricGuatemalanOsage
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,766
Tragic
$39,568
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,295
Tragic
$91,926
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,961
Tragic
$75,240
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,205
Tragic
$42,651
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,736
Tragic
$50,292
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,695
Tragic
$36,034
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,525
Tragic
$45,764
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,331
Tragic
$84,461
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,705
Tragic
$88,390
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,526
Tragic
$55,677
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.6%
Tragic
27.1%

Guatemalan vs Osage Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 30.0%), married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.060%), single mother poverty (32.9% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 0.90%), and single female poverty (23.8% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
Guatemalan vs Osage Poverty
Poverty MetricGuatemalanOsage
Poverty
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
13.6%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
9.7%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
16.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.2%
Tragic
17.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Tragic
17.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Males
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
16.5%
Single Females
Tragic
23.8%
Tragic
24.4%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.9%
Tragic
32.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.0%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.5%
Excellent
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.4%
Average
11.7%

Guatemalan vs Osage Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.8%), female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.9%).
Guatemalan vs Osage Unemployment
Unemployment MetricGuatemalanOsage
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Average
5.3%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.6%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Fair
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.7%

Guatemalan vs Osage Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.72%).
Guatemalan vs Osage Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricGuatemalanOsage
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
63.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Tragic
78.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
39.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Tragic
82.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.7%
Tragic
82.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.2%
Tragic
80.6%

Guatemalan vs Osage Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.5%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.8%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and average family size (3.40 compared to 3.18, a difference of 7.1%).
Guatemalan vs Osage Family Structure
Family Structure MetricGuatemalanOsage
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Tragic
63.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.9%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.3%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.40
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Average
6.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.9%
Excellent
47.5%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.1%
Fair
32.1%

Guatemalan vs Osage Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 26.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.7%).
Guatemalan vs Osage Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricGuatemalanOsage
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Exceptional
58.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Exceptional
22.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.8%

Guatemalan vs Osage Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 97.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 17.5%), and college, under 1 year (56.8% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Guatemalan vs Osage Education Level
Education Level MetricGuatemalanOsage
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
89.9%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
87.9%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
86.4%
Good
92.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Fair
91.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.0%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
78.5%
Tragic
84.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.8%
Tragic
62.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.2%
Tragic
55.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.5%
Tragic
41.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
33.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.7%

Guatemalan vs Osage Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 49.2%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 45.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.020%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 1.6%).
Guatemalan vs Osage Disability
Disability MetricGuatemalanOsage
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
14.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
8.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Tragic
14.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.5%
Tragic
27.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Tragic
49.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.7%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
7.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%