Peruvian vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,107,922 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Peruvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.712. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Peruvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Peruvians corresponds to an increase of 39.8 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($56,052 compared to $45,764, a difference of 22.5%), median household income ($90,261 compared to $75,240, a difference of 20.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,070 compared to $88,390, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.7%), median male earnings ($55,659 compared to $50,292, a difference of 10.7%), and median female earnings ($40,234 compared to $36,034, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 42.0%), single male poverty (11.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 39.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.070%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 26.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.54%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 13.0%), family households (67.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.6%), births to unmarried women (31.5% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 29.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 36.0%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 21.8%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.71%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 50.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 47.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 6.3%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.9%).