Cuban vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,000,766 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Osage within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.246. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to a decrease of 1.4 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Osage communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 16.4%), householder income over 65 years ($49,152 compared to $55,677, a difference of 13.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $45,764, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,301 compared to $88,390, a difference of 2.4%), median household income ($73,392 compared to $75,240, a difference of 2.5%), and median female earnings ($34,942 compared to $36,034, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Osage communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 57.7%), receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 55.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.39%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 35.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Osage communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 22.8%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (45.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 30.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 17.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.15%), no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 43.2%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 20.5%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 46.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 45.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 5.0%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.8%).