Immigrants from Thailand vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,960,311 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Osage within Immigrant from Thailand communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.082. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Thailand within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Thailand corresponds to a decrease of 6.5 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Osage communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($83,327 compared to $75,240, a difference of 10.7%), householder income under 25 years ($50,645 compared to $45,764, a difference of 10.7%), and wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,908 compared to $50,292, a difference of 5.2%), per capita income ($42,289 compared to $39,568, a difference of 6.9%), and median earnings ($45,598 compared to $42,651, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 27.0%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.63%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.89%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 10.9%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and currently married (45.4% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.12%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.93%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 53.8%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 15.8%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.28%), nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 50.1%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 31.7%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.26%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.65%), and disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.2%).