African vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,119,870 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.550. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Africans corresponds to an increase of 2.9 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between African and Osage communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 18.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,986 compared to $84,461, a difference of 6.9%), and median male earnings ($47,994 compared to $50,292, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,530 compared to $36,034, a difference of 1.4%), median earnings ($41,955 compared to $42,651, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($46,838 compared to $45,764, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between African and Osage communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 28.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 22.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (24.8% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 1.4%), single mother poverty (33.3% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and single father poverty (18.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between African and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 23.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 22.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between African and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.5% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between African and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 28.6%), births to unmarried women (39.7% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 23.8%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.81%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between African and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 41.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 25.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between African and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 24.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 5.8%), and college, under 1 year (61.1% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (32.9% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 0.45%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between African and Osage communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 34.4%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.40%), disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 4.7%).