Hawaiian vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,304,901 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.580. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 18.4 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $55,677, a difference of 16.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $45,764, a difference of 16.0%), and median household income ($84,729 compared to $75,240, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $50,292, a difference of 0.39%), per capita income ($39,403 compared to $39,568, a difference of 0.42%), and median earnings ($43,673 compared to $42,651, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 30.6%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 30.5%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 11.6%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.18, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.0%), no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.71%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.28%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.8% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and college, 1 year or more (55.6% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 50.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 20.1%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.94%), disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.8%).