Australian vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,494,077 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.881. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.645% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 1,644.6 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $39,568, a difference of 31.6%), median family income ($118,440 compared to $91,926, a difference of 28.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,533 compared to $88,390, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $45,764, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $55,677, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 30.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 28.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.85%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 31.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.48%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.6% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.21%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households (62.8% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.5%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 59.1%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 46.4%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 34.7%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 32.4%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.4%).