American vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,800,006 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Americans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Americans corresponds to an increase of 7.4 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between American and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($48,860 compared to $45,764, a difference of 6.8%), wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,536 compared to $88,390, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($92,096 compared to $91,926, a difference of 0.19%), median earnings ($42,742 compared to $42,651, a difference of 0.21%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,527 compared to $55,677, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between American and Osage communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 13.5%), single father poverty (20.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.25%), single female poverty (24.5% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between American and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 17.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between American and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.3% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.4% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between American and Osage communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.4% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 13.5%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (65.5% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.56%), currently married (48.0% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between American and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.0% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 0.42%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.0% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between American and Osage communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 8.4%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (89.1% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between American and Osage communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and hearing disability (3.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.14%), ambulatory disability (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.3%).