Arab vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,073,521 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Arab communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.464. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arabs corresponds to an increase of 8.6 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arab and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,566 compared to $88,390, a difference of 18.3%), median household income ($88,398 compared to $75,240, a difference of 17.5%), and median family income ($106,952 compared to $91,926, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.8%), householder income over 65 years ($62,266 compared to $55,677, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,219 compared to $45,764, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arab and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 27.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 23.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.2%), receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arab and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 19.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.32%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.77%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arab and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.97%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arab and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 16.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.9% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.14%), family households (64.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arab and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.6%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arab and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 36.4%), master's degree (16.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 32.9%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.19%), 10th grade (94.0% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arab and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 49.6%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 37.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.6%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 5.8%).