French Canadian vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,958,701 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Osage within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.093. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to a decrease of 3.4 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $45,764, a difference of 15.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $88,390, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,694 compared to $84,461, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.7%), householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $55,677, a difference of 4.1%), and median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $36,034, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 23.2%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.36%), single father poverty (18.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 26.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.84%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 7.3%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.10%), currently married (48.0% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.6%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 0.13%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.99%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.0%), master's degree (14.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.1%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 15.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 2.8%).