Jordanian vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,395,016 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.619. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to an increase of 15.8 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,376 compared to $88,390, a difference of 23.7%), median household income ($91,794 compared to $75,240, a difference of 22.0%), and median family income ($109,865 compared to $91,926, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $45,764, a difference of 13.2%), and median female earnings ($41,464 compared to $36,034, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 35.8%), single male poverty (12.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 34.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 17.3%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.0%), and births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (65.5% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 12.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.030%), no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 31.4%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.1%), and bachelor's degree (41.2% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.3% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.14%), 10th grade (94.4% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 62.6%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 43.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.8%).