Indian (Asian) vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,553,513 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Osage within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.266. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $84,461, a difference of 41.5%), median household income ($105,262 compared to $75,240, a difference of 39.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,343 compared to $88,390, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.3%), householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $55,677, a difference of 26.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $45,764, a difference of 27.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Osage communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 46.7%), single male poverty (11.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 46.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 50.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 22.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 31.9%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 29.8%), and births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.22%), currently married (48.0% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 61.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 76.3%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 75.4%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 62.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.5% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.23%), high school diploma (89.6% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 82.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 63.7%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.4%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.6%).