Liberian vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,839,454 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Osage within Liberian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.276. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Liberians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Liberians corresponds to a decrease of 3.8 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Liberian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 26.3%), householder income under 25 years ($48,917 compared to $45,764, a difference of 6.9%), and median female earnings ($38,215 compared to $36,034, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($91,722 compared to $91,926, a difference of 0.22%), median household income ($75,667 compared to $75,240, a difference of 0.57%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,929 compared to $88,390, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Liberian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 26.8%), receiving food stamps (14.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 26.1%), and single father poverty (16.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Liberian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Liberian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Liberian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 35.9%), births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and married-couple households (40.7% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (28.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Liberian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 47.9%), no vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 37.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 33.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Liberian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 9.1%), and bachelor's degree (34.6% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.25%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.8% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and college, under 1 year (63.0% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Liberian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 43.8%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 43.6%), and male disability (11.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.65%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.7%).