Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,814,608 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Immigrant from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.592% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago corresponds to an increase of 1,591.8 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Osage communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 40.0%), householder income under 25 years ($52,437 compared to $45,764, a difference of 14.6%), and median female earnings ($40,895 compared to $36,034, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,598 compared to $55,677, a difference of 0.14%), median male earnings ($51,376 compared to $50,292, a difference of 2.2%), and median family income ($93,988 compared to $91,926, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Osage communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 38.3%), receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 34.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty (15.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 36.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 36.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 29.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.2%), and married-couple households (41.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.67%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.18, a difference of 4.7%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 183.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 89.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 70.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.8% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 19.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.3% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 46.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 70.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 50.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 12.4%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.5% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.98%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Osage communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 64.6%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 61.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.1%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 4.6%).