Nepalese vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,125,314 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Nepalese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.717. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nepalese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.075% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nepalese corresponds to an increase of 74.7 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 21.8%), householder income under 25 years ($54,472 compared to $45,764, a difference of 19.0%), and median household income ($82,410 compared to $75,240, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,458 compared to $50,292, a difference of 1.7%), median family income ($94,153 compared to $91,926, a difference of 2.4%), and median earnings ($43,860 compared to $42,651, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 42.1%), single father poverty (14.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 31.9%), and receiving food stamps (14.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.48%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.5%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.6%), and male unemployment (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.77%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.5% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.1%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.2%), and family households with children (30.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.9%), births to unmarried women (33.5% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households (67.2% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 17.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 116.8%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 32.3%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.2% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 0.79%), college, 1 year or more (54.9% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and nursery school (96.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.97% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 87.8%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 23.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (28.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (52.6% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 5.6%).