Immigrants from Ghana vs Osage Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Ghana
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Osage
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Ghana

Osage

Poor
Fair
1,709
SOCIAL INDEX
14.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
290th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Osage Integration in Immigrants from Ghana Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,743,177 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Immigrant from Ghana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.201. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ghana within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ghana corresponds to an increase of 5.3 Osage.
Immigrants from Ghana Integration in Osage Communities

Immigrants from Ghana vs Osage Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Osage communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 21.3%), householder income under 25 years ($51,333 compared to $45,764, a difference of 12.2%), and median female earnings ($39,894 compared to $36,034, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($51,836 compared to $50,292, a difference of 3.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,760 compared to $84,461, a difference of 3.9%), and per capita income ($41,131 compared to $39,568, a difference of 4.0%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Osage Income
Income MetricImmigrants from GhanaOsage
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,131
Tragic
$39,568
Median Family Income
Tragic
$96,544
Tragic
$91,926
Median Household Income
Tragic
$81,489
Tragic
$75,240
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,641
Tragic
$42,651
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,836
Tragic
$50,292
Median Female Earnings
Good
$39,894
Tragic
$36,034
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,333
Tragic
$45,764
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$87,760
Tragic
$84,461
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,982
Tragic
$88,390
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,624
Tragic
$55,677
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
27.1%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Osage Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Osage communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 26.2%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 23.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.020%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and female poverty (15.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 3.4%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Osage Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from GhanaOsage
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
13.6%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
9.7%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.5%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
16.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
17.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
17.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
16.5%
Single Females
Tragic
21.9%
Tragic
24.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.9%
Tragic
32.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.9%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.8%
Excellent
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Average
11.7%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Osage Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 24.8%), and female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.1%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Osage Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from GhanaOsage
Unemployment
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Average
5.3%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Fair
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Osage Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Osage Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from GhanaOsage
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
63.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Tragic
78.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
39.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.7%
Tragic
82.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
82.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
80.6%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Osage Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 25.6%), married-couple households (41.8% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 12.2%), and currently married (42.7% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.53%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.4%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Osage Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from GhanaOsage
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Tragic
63.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.8%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Average
6.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.7%
Excellent
47.5%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.5%
Fair
32.1%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Osage Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 90.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 50.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 9.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.4% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 24.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 40.6%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Osage Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from GhanaOsage
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
83.4%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
47.4%
Exceptional
58.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
22.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
7.8%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Osage Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 48.4%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 19.3%), and bachelor's degree (36.9% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.1% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 0.59%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.93%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.95%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Osage Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from GhanaOsage
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.8%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Good
92.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.7%
Fair
91.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.4%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
84.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.1%
Tragic
62.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.4%
Tragic
55.8%
Associate's Degree
Poor
44.8%
Tragic
41.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
36.9%
Tragic
33.0%
Master's Degree
Average
15.0%
Tragic
12.6%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.7%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Osage Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Osage communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 59.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 50.0%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 4.4%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Osage Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from GhanaOsage
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
14.0%
Females
Average
12.2%
Tragic
14.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Tragic
8.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
14.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.5%
Tragic
27.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.7%
Tragic
49.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
7.4%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%