Maltese vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,473,072 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Maltese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.829. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Maltese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.230% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Maltese corresponds to an increase of 229.8 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Maltese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,064 compared to $84,461, a difference of 30.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,754 compared to $88,390, a difference of 29.8%), and median household income ($97,015 compared to $75,240, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 6.2%), householder income under 25 years ($53,735 compared to $45,764, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,027 compared to $55,677, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Maltese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 46.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 43.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 15.9%), and single mother poverty (26.6% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Maltese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 37.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Maltese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Maltese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.7%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.68%), family households (64.7% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (49.0% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Maltese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 16.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.44%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Maltese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 37.4%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 36.1%), and bachelor's degree (41.9% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.080%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Maltese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 36.5%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.6%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 9.3%).