Native/Alaskan vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,116,716 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.240. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 22.5 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $39,568, a difference of 18.9%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $91,926, a difference of 13.6%), and median male earnings ($44,775 compared to $50,292, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $45,764, a difference of 4.2%), median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $36,034, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $55,677, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 50.4%), receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 47.1%), and family poverty (14.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 3.9%), single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 12.3%), and single female poverty (28.2% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 48.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 47.7%), and male unemployment (7.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 34.1%), single father households (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 29.6%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.7%), divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (66.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 0.11%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.9%), master's degree (9.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 26.5%), and bachelor's degree (26.3% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (14.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.030%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.97%), and female disability (14.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 1.1%).