Sudanese vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,062,896 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Sudanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.254. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sudanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sudanese corresponds to an increase of 6.7 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 12.9%), median female earnings ($38,215 compared to $36,034, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,718 compared to $88,390, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,401 compared to $84,461, a difference of 0.070%), median male earnings ($51,216 compared to $50,292, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($46,982 compared to $45,764, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 26.1%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 19.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.37%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 38.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (42.1% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 11.4%), currently married (43.7% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.71%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and births to unmarried women (32.4% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 38.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 27.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 9.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.7%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 26.1%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.1% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and 11th grade (92.5% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 61.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 39.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 4.8%), cognitive disability (18.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.6%).