New Zealander vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,488,745 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.321% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 320.8 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Osage communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $39,568, a difference of 27.8%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $75,240, a difference of 26.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,286 compared to $88,390, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $45,764, a difference of 16.5%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $36,034, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Osage communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 25.4%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 25.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 32.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.61%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.3%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 13.5%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.4% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.23%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.70%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 19.8%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 61.0%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 51.0%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 52.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 32.1%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.0%).