Panamanian vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,932,921 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Panamanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.282. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Panamanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.131% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Panamanians corresponds to an increase of 130.6 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,611 compared to $45,764, a difference of 12.8%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and median household income ($82,272 compared to $75,240, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,266 compared to $55,677, a difference of 4.6%), median male earnings ($52,835 compared to $50,292, a difference of 5.1%), and per capita income ($42,035 compared to $39,568, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 27.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 24.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.070%), family poverty (9.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 24.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.0%), births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 44.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.9%), master's degree (14.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.5%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 0.14%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.8% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and ged/equivalency (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 39.2%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 36.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.020%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 4.1%).