Crow vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,963,097 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.196% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 196.5 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Osage communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 42.0%), per capita income ($31,729 compared to $39,568, a difference of 24.7%), and median family income ($76,605 compared to $91,926, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $36,034, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $45,764, a difference of 2.7%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $42,651, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Osage communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 75.6%), family poverty (16.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 65.7%), and single father poverty (30.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 59.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.3%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 18.4%), and single female poverty (32.4% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 32.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 268.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 266.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (13.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 228.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 42.1%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 25.9%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.18, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.3% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 27.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.16%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Osage communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 19.1%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 18.2%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.16%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.49%), and 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 47.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.8%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.25%), disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.87%).