Celtic vs Osage Community Comparison
COMPARE
Celtic
Osage
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Celtics
Osage
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Osage Integration in Celtic Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,189,592 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.203. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.410% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 409.9 Osage.
Celtic vs Osage Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,896 compared to $88,390, a difference of 11.9%), median household income ($83,193 compared to $75,240, a difference of 10.6%), and per capita income ($43,621 compared to $39,568, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.73%), median female earnings ($38,283 compared to $36,034, a difference of 6.2%), and median earnings ($45,732 compared to $42,651, a difference of 7.2%).
Income Metric | Celtic | Osage |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,621 | Tragic $39,568 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,139 | Tragic $91,926 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,193 | Tragic $75,240 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,732 | Tragic $42,651 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,242 | Tragic $50,292 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,283 | Tragic $36,034 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,447 | Tragic $45,764 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $92,241 | Tragic $84,461 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,896 | Tragic $88,390 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,608 | Tragic $55,677 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Tragic 27.1% |
Celtic vs Osage Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Osage communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.0%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 13.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 3.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 5.4%).
Poverty Metric | Celtic | Osage |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Tragic 13.6% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 9.7% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Tragic 14.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 16.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 17.9% | Tragic 19.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.4% | Tragic 17.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Tragic 17.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 17.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 16.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 24.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.9% | Tragic 32.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Excellent 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Average 11.7% |
Celtic vs Osage Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.060%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Celtic | Osage |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Average 5.3% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 6.9% | Average 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.7% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Fair 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.5% | Good 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Celtic vs Osage Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Celtic | Osage |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.8% | Tragic 63.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 78.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.3% | Exceptional 39.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 82.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.1% | Tragic 82.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.8% | Tragic 80.6% |
Celtic vs Osage Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.2%), divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.050%), currently married (47.8% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.71%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.93%).
Family Structure Metric | Celtic | Osage |
Family Households | Tragic 63.8% | Tragic 63.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.6% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.3% | Good 46.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Average 6.4% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.8% | Excellent 47.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 13.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Fair 32.1% |
Celtic vs Osage Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.6%), no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 0.65%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.76%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 4.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Celtic | Osage |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.1% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.2% | Exceptional 58.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 22.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Celtic vs Osage Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 18.7%), master's degree (14.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 17.4%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%).
Education Level Metric | Celtic | Osage |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.7% | Good 92.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.3% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.6% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.7% | Tragic 84.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.9% | Tragic 62.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Tragic 55.8% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Tragic 41.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Tragic 33.0% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.8% | Tragic 12.6% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.7% |
Celtic vs Osage Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 13.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.22%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.7%).
Disability Metric | Celtic | Osage |
Disability | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 14.0% |
Females | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.8% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 8.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 14.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.2% | Tragic 27.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.2% | Tragic 49.8% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Good 17.1% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |