Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,857,193 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Osage within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.260. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $84,461, a difference of 39.8%), median household income ($104,796 compared to $75,240, a difference of 39.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,222 compared to $88,390, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.0%), householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $45,764, a difference of 24.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,872 compared to $55,677, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 46.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 45.3%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 50.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 21.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 31.4%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 31.0%), and births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.090%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (48.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 55.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 78.6%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 77.5%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 65.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.67%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 78.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 65.0%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.2%).