Welsh vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,158,332 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Welsh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.759. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Welsh within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.095% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Welsh corresponds to an increase of 95.0 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Welsh and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,322 compared to $88,390, a difference of 13.5%), median household income ($83,628 compared to $75,240, a difference of 11.2%), and median family income ($102,151 compared to $91,926, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,856 compared to $36,034, a difference of 5.1%), wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and median earnings ($45,710 compared to $42,651, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Welsh and Osage communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.8%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 6.8%), single mother poverty (30.4% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Welsh and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 18.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.83%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Welsh and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.3% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.85%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Welsh and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.4%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 0.11%), family households (64.6% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Welsh and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 21.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 0.65%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Welsh and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.7%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 16.6%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%), nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and kindergarten (98.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Welsh and Osage communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 16.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.5%).