Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,535,018 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.112. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 55.3 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $39,568, a difference of 30.8%), median household income ($95,319 compared to $75,240, a difference of 26.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $88,390, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.76%), householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $45,764, a difference of 18.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $55,677, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 36.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 35.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 34.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 21.6%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.5%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.49%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 35.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 34.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 57.4%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 47.6%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 52.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 45.3%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.8%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 10.4%).