Nicaraguan vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,568,588 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Nicaraguan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.782. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nicaraguans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.059% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nicaraguans corresponds to an increase of 58.8 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,275 compared to $45,764, a difference of 16.4%), wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and median household income ($79,737 compared to $75,240, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($92,231 compared to $91,926, a difference of 0.33%), per capita income ($39,372 compared to $39,568, a difference of 0.50%), and median earnings ($43,026 compared to $42,651, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 46.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 42.2%), and receiving food stamps (16.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (18.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 31.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.0%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 20.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.97%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 14.2%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.8%), and currently married (44.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.6%), divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.7%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 67.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 10.6%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (41.5% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 0.12%), bachelor's degree (33.1% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 59.0%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 50.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.7%).