Immigrants from Western Asia vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,639,622 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Immigrant from Western Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Western Asia corresponds to an increase of 2.8 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,217 compared to $88,390, a difference of 20.2%), median household income ($90,005 compared to $75,240, a difference of 19.6%), and per capita income ($46,876 compared to $39,568, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.9%), householder income over 65 years ($62,645 compared to $55,677, a difference of 12.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,190 compared to $45,764, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 31.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 27.9%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.93%), male poverty (11.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and family poverty (9.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 25.8%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.97%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 20.2%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.1%), and births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.9% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.14%), family households (64.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 31.0%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 27.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 46.2%), master's degree (17.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 38.9%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.1% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.0%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 65.3%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 43.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.8%).