Slavic vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,511,042 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.145% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 145.2 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,629 compared to $88,390, a difference of 16.1%), median household income ($86,398 compared to $75,240, a difference of 14.8%), and median family income ($105,144 compared to $91,926, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($39,613 compared to $36,034, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $45,764, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Osage communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 24.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 24.1%), and single male poverty (13.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 8.2%), and single father poverty (17.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 22.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 10.0%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.38%), births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 11.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.22%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Osage communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 23.3%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 23.0%), and bachelor's degree (38.9% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 24.3%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.1%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 8.0%).