French vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,711,081 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within French communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.128. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French corresponds to an increase of 1.9 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,824 compared to $88,390, a difference of 12.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,230 compared to $45,764, a difference of 11.9%), and median family income ($102,368 compared to $91,926, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 6.0%), median female earnings ($38,457 compared to $36,034, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $55,677, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French and Osage communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 18.1%), and family poverty (8.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.4%), single father poverty (18.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and single mother poverty (30.7% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.9%), divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.48%), currently married (48.4% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and married-couple households (48.0% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.4%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 14.8%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 14.9%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.4%).