Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Sudanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,944,399 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sudanese within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.149. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Sudanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Sudanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $84,401, a difference of 39.9%), median household income ($104,796 compared to $78,529, a difference of 33.5%), and median male earnings ($66,903 compared to $51,216, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 12.9%), householder income over 65 years ($69,872 compared to $58,281, a difference of 19.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $46,982, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 43.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 40.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.9%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 23.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 33.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 35.5%), births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 29.4%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.69%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (64.9% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 37.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 0.74%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.6%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 41.5%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 35.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 3.0%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.9%).