Arapaho vs Sudanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 17,936,045 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.922. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.532% in Sudanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 2,532.5 Sudanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $41,695, a difference of 28.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $93,718, a difference of 23.4%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $51,216, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $58,281, a difference of 1.9%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $46,982, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 68.0%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 51.1%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 185.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 180.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (10.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 148.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 26.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 15.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 12.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 45.4%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.0%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (41.8% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 0.63%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 66.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 48.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 33.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 79.3%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 61.4%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.090%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and high school diploma (88.6% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 26.3%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and female disability (13.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.3%).