New Zealander vs Sudanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,492,401 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.691. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.172% in Sudanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 171.8 Sudanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $84,401, a difference of 24.5%), per capita income ($50,575 compared to $41,695, a difference of 21.3%), and median household income ($95,146 compared to $78,529, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $38,215, a difference of 11.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $46,982, a difference of 13.4%), and median earnings ($51,246 compared to $44,419, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.5%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 23.9%), and receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.45%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.76%), and single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 22.9%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.7%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.97%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.28%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 38.4%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 28.3%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.68%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.71%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.7%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.16%), disability (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.77%), and male disability (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.5%).