Immigrants from South Africa vs Sudanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,543,938 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese within Immigrant from South Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.184. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.144% in Sudanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Africa corresponds to an increase of 143.8 Sudanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,748 compared to $84,401, a difference of 25.3%), per capita income ($51,465 compared to $41,695, a difference of 23.4%), and median male earnings ($62,899 compared to $51,216, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,705 compared to $46,982, a difference of 10.1%), median female earnings ($42,508 compared to $38,215, a difference of 11.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,234 compared to $58,281, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (14.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 26.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 25.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.65%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 16.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 20.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.9%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.53%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.10%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.49%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.4%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 29.1%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.57%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 15.5%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 13.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.7%).