Latvian vs Sudanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,619,862 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.693. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.194% in Sudanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 194.3 Sudanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $84,401, a difference of 29.1%), per capita income ($52,649 compared to $41,695, a difference of 26.3%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $96,783, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $46,982, a difference of 12.3%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $38,215, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $58,281, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 44.3%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 41.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.0%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 30.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.6%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.1%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (62.8% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.030%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 49.9%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 34.5%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.80%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 17.2%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.6%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.63%), male disability (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.84%).