Pima vs Sudanese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Sudanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Sudanese

Poor
Average
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,867
SOCIAL INDEX
46.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
190th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Sudanese Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,478,216 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.896. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.217% in Sudanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 216.6 Sudanese.
Pima Integration in Sudanese Communities

Pima vs Sudanese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $41,695, a difference of 36.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $93,718, a difference of 27.7%), and median family income ($77,431 compared to $96,783, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $84,401, a difference of 1.9%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $38,215, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $46,982, a difference of 9.6%).
Pima vs Sudanese Income
Income MetricPimaSudanese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Tragic
$41,695
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Tragic
$96,783
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Tragic
$78,529
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Tragic
$44,419
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Tragic
$51,216
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Tragic
$38,215
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Tragic
$46,982
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Tragic
$84,401
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Tragic
$93,718
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Tragic
$58,281
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Exceptional
24.0%

Pima vs Sudanese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 102.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 102.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 84.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 7.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 23.4%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 28.5%).
Pima vs Sudanese Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaSudanese
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
10.0%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Tragic
15.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Tragic
23.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Tragic
14.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
19.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Tragic
18.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Tragic
18.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
18.6%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
30.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Fair
12.0%

Pima vs Sudanese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 184.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 154.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 121.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 9.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 42.3%).
Pima vs Sudanese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaSudanese
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
15.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Excellent
5.3%

Pima vs Sudanese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 25.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 18.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 13.6%).
Pima vs Sudanese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaSudanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Exceptional
68.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Exceptional
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Exceptional
42.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Exceptional
78.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Excellent
83.0%

Pima vs Sudanese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 72.6%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 58.9%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.99%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (65.9% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 9.9%).
Pima vs Sudanese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaSudanese
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
60.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Tragic
42.1%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Tragic
43.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Fair
32.4%

Pima vs Sudanese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 43.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 39.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 3.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 23.4%).
Pima vs Sudanese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaSudanese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Tragic
53.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
5.6%

Pima vs Sudanese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 67.6%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 65.4%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 58.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and 6th grade (97.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.39%).
Pima vs Sudanese Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaSudanese
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
97.1%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Fair
94.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Average
92.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Fair
91.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Fair
85.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Good
66.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Good
60.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Good
47.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Good
38.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Excellent
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.1%

Pima vs Sudanese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 63.2%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 59.1%), and ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 7.0%).
Pima vs Sudanese Disability
Disability MetricPimaSudanese
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Good
11.5%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Good
12.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Fair
47.5%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
18.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.2%