Nonimmigrants vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 297,669,838 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within Nonimmigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.436. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nonimmigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nonimmigrants corresponds to a decrease of 10.3 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($79,429 compared to $116,460, a difference of 46.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,301 compared to $129,122, a difference of 46.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,448 compared to $135,508, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 8.4%), householder income under 25 years ($49,348 compared to $59,424, a difference of 20.4%), and median female earnings ($37,024 compared to $49,256, a difference of 33.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 70.5%), receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 69.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 64.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 46.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 36.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.78%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 29.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 54.4%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 42.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.6%), family households (64.8% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 4.2%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.050%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 90.1%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 81.3%), and master's degree (13.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 68.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.3% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.12%), 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 66.2%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 59.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 5.5%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.4%).