Immigrants from Uganda vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,311,386 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.643. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.147% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 146.6 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,698 compared to $129,122, a difference of 34.9%), median household income ($87,553 compared to $116,460, a difference of 33.0%), and median male earnings ($56,064 compared to $74,031, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $59,424, a difference of 13.5%), wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 18.2%), and median female earnings ($40,739 compared to $49,256, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 62.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 54.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 15.1%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 45.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 26.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 40.3%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 32.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.16%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households (62.7% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 29.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 27.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 44.5%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 40.2%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 42.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 37.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.8%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.7%).