Immigrants from Caribbean vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 278,688,930 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.700. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to a decrease of 3.6 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($83,319 compared to $136,949, a difference of 64.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,513 compared to $135,508, a difference of 64.2%), and median household income ($71,860 compared to $116,460, a difference of 62.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,757 compared to $59,424, a difference of 17.1%), median female earnings ($36,414 compared to $49,256, a difference of 35.3%), and wage/income gap (20.4% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 44.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (19.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 168.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 90.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 88.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 10.8%), single father poverty (17.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 26.8%), and single male poverty (13.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 29.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 37.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 36.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 78.8%), births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 73.1%), and divorced or separated (13.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.33 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.7%), family households (65.3% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 154.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 69.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 14.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 35.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 51.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 149.6%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 99.5%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 86.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.83%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 44.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 44.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.7%).