Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,856,509 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.350. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.102% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 101.6 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,355 compared to $129,122, a difference of 56.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,764 compared to $135,508, a difference of 56.2%), and median male earnings ($47,433 compared to $74,031, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,643 compared to $59,424, a difference of 22.2%), wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 29.9%), and median female earnings ($35,930 compared to $49,256, a difference of 37.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 133.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 106.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (22.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 104.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 30.8%), single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 43.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 45.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 58.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 43.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 69.4%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 61.6%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.35 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.3%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (65.2% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 73.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 109.3%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 94.7%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 80.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 79.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 65.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 10.9%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 15.7%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.6%).