Immigrants from Croatia vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,813,148 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within Immigrant from Croatia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.499. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Croatia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.642% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Croatia corresponds to an increase of 641.7 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($92,225 compared to $116,460, a difference of 26.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,304 compared to $135,508, a difference of 25.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,503 compared to $129,122, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,343 compared to $59,424, a difference of 9.3%), wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and median female earnings ($43,258 compared to $49,256, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 36.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 35.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.1%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 29.4%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 18.6%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 68.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 40.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 28.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 54.6%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 34.1%), and master's degree (17.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.5% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.13%), 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.4%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 29.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.070%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.0%).