Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,850,257 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.051. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to an increase of 6.9 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($53,237 compared to $74,031, a difference of 39.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,876 compared to $129,122, a difference of 39.0%), and median household income ($85,054 compared to $116,460, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,643 compared to $59,424, a difference of 12.9%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 19.2%), and median female earnings ($39,186 compared to $49,256, a difference of 25.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 66.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 51.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 8.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.8%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 33.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 45.0%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 43.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.69%), family households with children (28.3% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (65.6% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 32.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 79.4%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 61.2%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 36.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 31.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.2%).