Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 293,544,171 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within Scotch-Irish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.525. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scotch-Irish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scotch-Irish corresponds to an increase of 51.3 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($80,972 compared to $116,460, a difference of 43.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,969 compared to $129,122, a difference of 43.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,073 compared to $135,508, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($49,039 compared to $59,424, a difference of 21.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,447 compared to $77,051, a difference of 29.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 57.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 49.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 38.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 32.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 33.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 44.5%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 31.6%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.7% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 4.1%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.24, a difference of 4.3%), and family households (64.4% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.9% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.9% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 70.4%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 64.4%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.8% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.27%), 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.4% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 69.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 65.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.9%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.6%).