Immigrants from Serbia vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,804,502 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within Immigrant from Serbia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Serbia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Serbia corresponds to a decrease of 17.9 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($91,730 compared to $116,460, a difference of 27.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,569 compared to $135,508, a difference of 26.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,155 compared to $129,122, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,321 compared to $59,424, a difference of 11.5%), wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and median female earnings ($43,385 compared to $49,256, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 34.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 30.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.16%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.8% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 22.9%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 18.3%), and married-couple households (45.7% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.5%), currently married (47.0% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 54.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 49.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 16.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 34.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 36.7%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 21.6%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.5% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.14%), 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 18.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.3% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.63%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 6.1%).