Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,705,224 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within Immigrant from Nepal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.358. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nepal within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.047% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nepal corresponds to an increase of 47.2 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,322 compared to $129,122, a difference of 35.5%), median household income ($87,046 compared to $116,460, a difference of 33.8%), and median male earnings ($55,615 compared to $74,031, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,611 compared to $59,424, a difference of 13.0%), wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 18.4%), and median female earnings ($40,704 compared to $49,256, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 44.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 44.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and single father poverty (14.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 23.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (68.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 36.9%), births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 28.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (62.7% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 36.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 35.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 47.8%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 46.8%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 34.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 31.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.9%).