Central American vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 291,160,513 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.670. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to a decrease of 4.6 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,093 compared to $74,031, a difference of 53.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,144 compared to $129,122, a difference of 51.6%), and median family income ($91,087 compared to $136,949, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,626 compared to $59,424, a difference of 12.9%), wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 27.5%), and median female earnings ($36,492 compared to $49,256, a difference of 35.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 93.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 81.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 81.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 15.2%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 16.5%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 28.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 35.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 62.4%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 59.6%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 0.32%), family households (66.0% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.24, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 40.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 119.5%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 97.2%), and master's degree (12.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 84.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 42.5%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 35.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 12.3%).